Why Planning is Like the Judicial System, and Why it Shouldn't Be

Planning has become too much like a court case, with two sides and one winner. According to columnist Christopher Hume, this adversarial nature must be changed.

1 minute read

May 7, 2008, 10:00 AM PDT

By Nate Berg

"City planning in Ontario has come to resemble nothing so much as the judicial system."

"Both are treated as if they're games in which there must be a winner and a loser."

"But both are too complex for such a simplistic approach. And in both, the chances for mistakes are enormous."

"And although changing cultures as ingrained as planning and the law will require generations, it is something that must be done."

"Just as Crown attorneys and defence lawyers call their own friendly expert witnesses in an attempt to win the case at any cost, so developers and opponents hire their experts to bolster their argument, no matter how wrong."

"What follows can be self-serving if not outright false, but the process allows and encourages such behaviour."

"It also favours the rich and powerful over the poor and weak."

FULL STORY: Let's find a better way to plan a city

Tuesday, May 6, 2008 in The Toronto Star

Government / Politics Land Use Ontario Planning Process Toronto

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching. Mary G., Urban Planner

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching.

Mary G., Urban Planner

Get top-rated, practical training

Start Learning

Advertise with us

Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools

This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.