Cash for Blunders

"Cash for Clunkers" was upside-down and wrong-headed, rewarding bad behavior rather than punishing it, says Libertarian Richard A. Epstein.

1 minute read

October 26, 2009, 11:00 AM PDT

By Tim Halbur

With a new $2 billion in funding working its way through Congress for 'Cash for Clunkers', Epstein warns that the 'mega-program' is impossible to manage and rewards polluters instead of punishing them.

He writes, "Since buying off wrongdoers creates upside-down incentives, we should tax the offenders. Unfortunately, for pollution, this approach is not easy to implement in the absence of any reliable technology to monitor automobile pollution mile by mile. But we can find a respectable proxy by imposing an age-adjusted licensing fee tailored to the amount of ambient air pollution in different locales."

FULL STORY: Cool It, Congress

Sunday, October 25, 2009 in Forbes

Government / Politics United States Libertarian Cash for Clunkers

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching. Mary G., Urban Planner

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching.

Mary G., Urban Planner

Get top-rated, practical training

Start Learning

Advertise with us

Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools

This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.